1. The Tank Capacity Imbalance (Physics Fail)

• The Problem: The second specification table lists a Solution Tank capacity of 4L and a Recovery Tank capacity of 12L. For an extractor, this makes absolutely no physical sense. You cannot recover 12 liters of dirty water if you only sprayed 4 liters of clean solution into the sofa.

• The Fix: These two numbers are almost certainly flipped. It is highly likely the fresh solution tank is 12L and the dirty water recovery tank is 4L (or both are a balanced size like 10L/10L). Check the physical machine blueprint to confirm.

2. The Multi-Motor Identity Crisis (Floor Polisher vs. Sofa Spray Extractor)

• The Problem: Under Key Features, it claims the machine offers "features for burnishing." * The Reality: "Burnishing" means high-speed polishing of hard tile or concrete floors to give them a glossy shine. A fabric sofa cleaner cannot burnish a fabric couch. This word was accidentally left over from a floor-buffer spec sheet.

• The Fix: Delete the word "burnishing." Replace it with "deep injection extraction" or "upholstery shampooing."

3. More Misapplied Industrial Jargon

• The Problem: Once again, the sheet lists the Cleaning Type as Clean-In-Place (CIP).

• The Fix: CIP refers to fixed factory pipelines that clean themselves automatically. A manual upholstery tool used by a human operator is not CIP. Change this line to Manual Spray-Extraction / Injection-Suction.

4. Overly Redundant Tables & Vague Data

• The Problem: You have two separate specification tables back-to-back that completely repeat each other (Voltage, Vacuum Motor, Foam Motor, Brush Motor, Spray Motor, Noise Level, Airflow, and Dimensions are all listed twice). Additionally, Machine Type: Other looks incredibly sloppy to a business buyer.

• The Fix: Consolidate everything into a single, highly professional table. Change Machine Type to Commercial Upholstery & Sofa Extractor.

Here is how your unified, corrected specification table should look:

Corrected Technical Specifications